Menu Search Icon Mail Icon
Davis Saperstein & Salomon
Call Today 201-907-5000
No fee if no recovery
All consultations are free

Employment Newsletter

Discriminatory Treatment in the Workplace Related to Bankruptcy

Section 525 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code prohibits employers from firing or otherwise discriminating against a person who “is or has been a debtor” in bankruptcy. This anti-discrimination provision of the Code is intended to further the goal of allowing debtors who have formally filed for bankruptcy to make a “fresh start.”

Scope of Protection

The prohibition against employment discrimination based on bankruptcy applies to both government employers and private employers, and is meant to protect the following categories of people:

  • An individual who is or has been a debtor
  • An individual who has been insolvent prior to the commencement of a bankruptcy case, or during a case before grant or denial of a discharge
  • An individual who has not paid a debt that is dischargeable in a bankruptcy case, or that has been discharged under the Bankruptcy Act

Intent to File Does Not Warrant Debtor Protection

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has set forth a bright line rule for determining exactly which employees are protected by Section 525. Specifically, the court held that an employer who fires a debtor employee after learning of the debtor employee’s intent to file bankruptcy does not violate the Code. Rather, protection only extends to employees who have already filed for bankruptcy.

In the aforementioned case, the debtor was hospitalized and incurred substantial medical expenses at a hospital where he was also employed. The debtor was ultimately unable to pay off his debt and informed the hospital that he was planning to file for bankruptcy. Subsequently, the hospital fired the debtor. The court ruled that the debtor did not have a valid action against the hospital for unlawful termination under Section 525, because the Code’s protection extends only to an individual who “is or has been a debtor.” In this case, however, the hospital fired the debtor before the debtor filed for bankruptcy. As such, Section 525 did not apply.

  • Employer Precautions When Sharing Trade Secrets
    Generally, a “trade secret” is any valuable business information that is kept confidential in order to give the business a commercial advantage in the marketplace. Trade secrets are valuable forms of property and thus, the... Read more.
  • Considerations When Conducting a Mass Layoff
    Before executing a mass layoff, employers must consider all possible legal repercussions. Important considerations may include a close review of any labor or employment contract language and applicable state and federal laws. If such... Read more.
  • Workplace Discrimination and the Plaintiff's Burden of Proof
    According to a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., an employee may have a right to a jury trial based on discrimination even where no direct evidence of discrimination is offered. The... Read more.
  • Employer Bankruptcy and Employee Benefits
    Generally, a business that is facing serious financial difficulties might seek to file for bankruptcy under either Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Chapter 7 bankruptcy is more severe, as it involves a liquidation of... Read more.
Law Commentary Legal News
Share This Page:
Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C., is located in Teaneck NJ and serves clients in and around Teaneck, Hackensack, Bergenfield, Tenafly, Englewood, New Milford, Palisades Park, Englewood Cliffs, Dumont, River Edge, Demarest, Haworth, Oradell, Leonia, Bogota, Maywood, Closter, Alpine, Emerson, Fort Lee, Ridgefield Park, Little Ferry, Bergen County, Hudson County and Passaic County.
Designed and Powered by NextClient

© 2025 Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. All rights reserved. Custom WebShop™ law firm website design by NextClient.com.